Authors: Mohammad Sameer Hussain, Jaspreet Kaur, Er. Gundeep Kaur
Abstract: Decision making systems are using a combination of style rules and new style artificial intelligence to help people make good choices. The old style rules are good because they are clear and easy to understand and they make sure people follow the rules. The old style rules have some problems though. They are hard to scale up. They cost a lot to maintain. Decision making systems that use style rules do not adapt well to new situations. On the hand the new style artificial intelligence like the kind that understands human language can find patterns and help with tough decisions. The style artificial intelligence is really good, at helping people make good choices because it can understand what people are saying and find patterns that the old style rules cannot. The style artificial intelligence is a big help to decision making systems because it can do things that the old style rules cannot. Decision making systems that use the style artificial intelligence can make better choices because they have more information and can understand what people are saying. This kind of intelligence has some problems. Artificial intelligence can make things up. It can be hard to understand intelligence. Also when something goes wrong with intelligence systems like these artificial intelligence systems it is not clear who is responsible, for the artificial intelligence. This paper reviews expert perspectives on both approaches and compares them in terms of interpretability, robustness, data dependence, deployment constraints, and evaluation. Evidence across multiple domains suggests that hybrid architectures integrating explicit rules, structured knowledge, and generative components provide a practical path toward trustworthy and adaptive decision- making.