Authors: Felix Corvin
Abstract: In the modern era of digital infrastructure, organizations are increasingly adopting Infrastructure as Code (IaC) to manage and automate the provisioning and configuration of resources across both on-premises and cloud environments. IaC ensures consistency, repeatability, and efficiency by allowing infrastructure to be defined and maintained through version-controlled code. Among the many tools available, Puppet and Ansible have emerged as two of the most widely adopted solutions, each bringing distinct advantages to the automation landscape. Puppet is based on a declarative model and is particularly suited for policy enforcement and large-scale system state management. Ansible, by contrast, follows a procedural model and is known for its flexibility, simplicity, and agentless operation. This review examines the rationale, architecture, and best practices behind co-deploying Puppet and Ansible within hybrid environments. Rather than viewing these tools as mutually exclusive, the paper explores how they can be used in complementary roles to achieve higher degrees of automation maturity, compliance, and infrastructure resilience. The review discusses how Puppet can handle base operating system configurations and enforce long-term system states, while Ansible is better suited for orchestration tasks, application deployment, and change management.