Authors: Hari Om Dhar Badgaiyan, Assistant Professor Hariram Sahu
Abstract: The deck girder is one of the most influential components governing the structural response, stiffness, weight, durability, and overall economy of a cable-stayed bridge, and the choice between reinforced concrete (RC), structural steel, and prestressed concrete (PSC) remains a central design decision. This paper presents a structured literature review of published research relevant to this choice, covering material-specific behaviour of RC, steel, and PSC deck girders; design practice and analytical studies on tower geometry, dynamic/seismic response, and finite element modelling; direct comparative studies between deck materials and hybrid/composite systems; economic and life-cycle cost studies; construction-stage and composite-action behaviour; and studies conducted under Indian IRC loading provisions. The review finds general agreement that RC decks are economical and durable under normal service but suffer from higher self-weight and tensile cracking over longer spans; steel decks offer a superior strength-to-weight ratio and rapid erection but require sustained corrosion protection and careful fatigue design; and PSC decks combine improved stiffness and crack control with the durability of concrete, at the cost of higher initial complexity. The review further finds that although each material has been studied extensively in isolation or in pairwise comparison, very few investigations evaluate reinforced concrete, structural steel, and prestressed concrete decks together under identical bridge geometry, loading, and analytical procedure, and fewer still combine such a structural comparison with a consistent life-cycle economic evaluation. This gap is identified as the principal motivation for a unified, controlled-variable comparative investigation of the three deck systems.