To Evaluate the Proposed Routing Protocol Across Several Networks Circumstances
Authors:-Assistant Professor Thrisha V.S., Professor Dr. T.N. Anitha
Abstract-This Internetv of Thingsv (IoTv)v has become one of the greatest noteworthy areas of computing because to the quick development of technology and internet-connected gadgets. IoTv ecosystem-targeting standards, technologies, and platforms are being created quickly. For a variety of uses, including healthcare, home automation, disaster recovery, and industry automation, IoTv makes it possible for things to communicate and plan activities. Itv isv anticipated that it will eventually cover even more applications. This article examines several standards developed by the IEEEv, IETFv, and ITUv that support technologies allowing the explosive rise of IoTv. To fulfil the needs of the IoTv, these standards encompass protocols for the communicationsv, routingv, networkv, and sessionv layers. The issue also includes management and security standards, providing details on the research being done to address these difficulties in addition to the current IoTv challenges. We propose simulation-based research to put a number on how important a cross-layerv designv is for better-quality QoSv sustenance in radiocommunication adv hocv systems. Using the J-Simv simulator, we contrast the layered architecture utilizing the AODVv routing protocol with the CROSS-LAYERv Engine design using QoS-PARv as a routing protocol. We make use of J-Sim since cross-layer implementations are suited for it. In addition to the recommended routing protocol, QoS-PARv, and the LYMPv protocol, we used it to create the entire CROSS LAYERv Engine architecture. The movement of nodes in mobile ad hoc networks frequently changes the network structure, making routing in MANETsv a challenging problem. The efficient routing algorithms could considerably benefit mobile ad hoc networks in terms of performance and reliability. Such networks have been the subject of several routing protocol proposals thus far. There have been some studies published in the literature evaluating the performance of suggested routing protocols under CBRv traffic with various network conditions, but little attention has been paid to evaluating their performance when applied to traffic generators other than CBRv, such as FTPv, TELNETv, etcv. The complexity of traffic in actual applications is not reflected by CBRv trafficv, and the trafficv scenarios described here are more like the network loads experienced by MANETsv in the real world. This article examines the performance of the three routing protocols AODVv, DSRv, and WRPv for FTPv, TELNETv, and CBRv traffic in terms of packet delivery ratio, throughput, average end-to-end delay, and routing message overhead. Many network circumstances are considered, including the effects of modifying the halt length and the quantity of source destinations. For the consolidation and centralization of the public safety network’s main services, it is essential to assess which routing protocol provides the best performance and throughput in a mission-criticalv setting. The following routingv protocolsv are evaluated: Routingv Informationv Protocolv (RIPv), Openv Shortestv Pathv Firstv (OSPFv), Interior Gatewayv Routingv Protocolv (IGRP), and Enhancedv Interiorv Gatewayv Routingv Protocolv (EGIRPv). Convergencev, throughputv, and queuingv delay are also evaluated. The network is simulated using Riverbed Modeler Academic Edition 17.5vv. According to a study of the results, which procedure should be utilized.